Tech Trikes

Lawmakers mull federal response to state and local technology gaps

MPs are looking for ways Congress can inspire state and local governments to modernize their IT programs.

During Wednesday’s hearing, organized by a subcommittee of the Home Oversight and Reform Committee, witnesses and members of Congress outlined ways to update legacy technology, train technical staff, and address the scalability of presidential programs.

“The pandemic has naked the results of many years of deferred funding in government information technology, and we must not let the teachings discovered during the disaster go to waste,” said president of Representative Gerry Connolly (D-Va.). Authority Steering Subcommittee of Home Committee on Monitoring and Improvement. “Federal authorities can serve as a useful resource for providing operations and best practices on IT modernization as it additionally swallows those drugs.”

Connolly plans to introduce a housemate in the Senate bill, supported by censors Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.), known as the State and Native Digital Services Act. . It could authorize funding for the federal American Digital Service and state and local tech strike groups modeled after 18F.

Connolly also said he intends to reintroduce the Restore the Partnership Act, which could reinstate an intergovernmental process pressure he says would encourage intergovernmental work at government IT points. Will give

Code for America CEO Amanda Renteria recommends reducing administrative burden and complexity and increasing knowledge operations.

Streamlining cybersecurity and knowledge privacy regulations could potentially be particularly impactful, as noted by Teri Takai, VP at the Heart for Digital Authorities and a former Security Division CIO.

“I think this is important because it is a burden, especially on the state, though more so on local authorities, to ensure compliance,” Takai defined, emphasizing that it should be passed on to state and local authorities. should be done with entering.

A 2020 report from the Authorities Accountability Workplace found that “every federal company that exchanges knowledge [with states] has special rules, indications, or different requirements for states when they access Carry, store, and transmit… Policies can save hundreds of thousands in federal and state prices.

Doug Robinson, government director of the Nationwide Association of State Chief Information Officers, advised that Congress empower the administration and the fund’s workplace to harmonize regulations across all companies.

The pandemic also revealed another problem – many government programs were unable to scale fast enough to meet spikes in demand for government services.

“It is not related to the availability of technology to solve the problem. Apart from creating additional citizen centric choices, it is a compulsory enterprise course of re-engineering. That’s where there was clearly a place,” Robinson said. “The states were not prepared for that form of demand.”

He said that modernization of legacy programs would require state governments to engage not only at the workplaces of state CIOs, but also with the budget-making government and legislative branches.

Takai said that after their modernization, the states should adopt a commercial approach.

“The relationship between IT modernization, digital citizen providers and cyber security is essential. There is a danger that all three of these technology efforts could be viewed separately,” she said. “It is impossible to drive digital transformation without expertise in the general enterprise methodology.”

Progress will also require employees

Alan Shark, government director of the Public Institute of Technology, said state and local governments are missing a good market for IT expertise, as are government companies and the private sector. He said that the authorities should redeploy IT professionals to the ever-changing panorama.

Robinson also made famous that states were unprepared to deal with fraud during spikes in demand for unemployment benefits.

“Only in the latest months have [states] invested in better analytics and automated fraud detection providers,” he noted. “All they can admit is that they didn’t expect anything as much as the pandemic, when it came to the magnitude, the volume and speed of these requests coming in, and so they didn’t have the ability to predict was to prevent analytics fraud.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.